Bengaluru: The Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited (BMRCL) has faced severe criticism after a video surfaced on social media showing a farmer being denied entry to the metro service due to his shabby attire. The incident, which occurred at the Rajajinagar metro station, sparked outrage among commuters, leading to a confrontation with security personnel.
In the video, a commuter identified as Karthik C Airani can be seen challenging the security staff about the farmer’s exclusion from the platforms. Karthik questions the basis for denying entry to the farmer, emphasizing that the individual possesses a valid ticket and does not carry any prohibited items in his sack, which solely contains clothes. He vehemently argues against any rule mandating a dress code for metro commuters, denouncing the discrimination against individuals from less privileged backgrounds.
UNBELIEVABLE..! Is metro only for VIPs? Is there a dress code to use Metro?
I appreciate actions of Karthik C Airani, who fought for the right of a farmer at Rajajinagar metro station. We need more such heroes everywhere. @OfficialBMRCL train your officials properly. #metro pic.twitter.com/7SAZdlgAEH— Deepak N (@DeepakN172) February 24, 2024
Another commuter joins Karthik’s protest, asserting that the farmer’s attire should not serve as grounds for denial unless he is in possession of restricted items. The commuter highlights the unfairness of the situation and questions the basis for such discriminatory treatment.
Eventually, despite the objections raised by security officials, the farmer was allowed to use the metro service from Rajajinagar, thanks to the intervention of the concerned commuters.
The incident underscores broader concerns about inclusivity, discrimination, and access to public services. The BMRCL’s dress code policy has come under scrutiny, with many questioning its necessity and fairness, particularly in the context of a public transport system meant to serve all members of society regardless of their attire or background.
As the video continues to circulate on social media, it has ignited conversations about the need for sensitivity and equity in public service delivery, prompting calls for a review of policies that may perpetuate discrimination or exclusion.
Also read:
